I love my Telecaster

Anything to do with the things that make the music we listen to.
Post Reply
User avatar
andrew Ivimey
No idea why I do this anymore
Posts: 6609
Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2007 8:33 am
Location: Bedford

I love my Telecaster

Post by andrew Ivimey » Mon Mar 12, 2012 9:19 am

Are they all like this? battered, used CHEAP!, but such tones!!!!

Start me Up!
Philosophers have only interpreted the world - the point, however, is to change it. No it isn't ... maybe we should leave it alone for a while.

User avatar
Dave the bass
Amstrad Tower of Power
Posts: 10737
Joined: Tue May 22, 2007 4:36 pm
Location: NW Kent, Darn Sarf innit.

Post by Dave the bass » Mon Mar 12, 2012 9:37 am

Pictures of you dressed as 'Keef' or it didn't/hasn't happened.............. :)

DTB
Dirt eating, low-voltage boy but "'Occasionally phenomenal'"

User avatar
Paul Barker
No idea why I do this anymore
Posts: 6910
Joined: Mon May 21, 2007 9:42 pm

Post by Paul Barker » Tue Mar 13, 2012 2:47 pm

I am hoping that the Axe I am building will be worthy of your fingers, so you can show me if it is any good or not.

i am having to use a pretty pants Japanease Neck because I can't keep spending money but I have a nice solid body which I am French Polishing and Seymore Duncan Alnico 2 pickups which should give soft vintage tones. I believe Alnico 2 doesn't have cobalt (even tho it has cobalt in the name) which makes it less aggressive and more smooth but lower output.

Anyway the tuning machines are chronic the neck is probably nothing special but brass intonation saddles (though in my hands intonation is highly unlikely to be correct, maybe you will adjust that for me?).

Do you think it is important to use through body stringing? I would need to drill holes to accomodate that. I suppose it would be a good idea.

User avatar
andrew Ivimey
No idea why I do this anymore
Posts: 6609
Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2007 8:33 am
Location: Bedford

Post by andrew Ivimey » Tue Mar 13, 2012 2:53 pm

Through body stringing means a different bridge piece which is probably better
all round than the classic arrangement.
Philosophers have only interpreted the world - the point, however, is to change it. No it isn't ... maybe we should leave it alone for a while.

User avatar
Paul Barker
No idea why I do this anymore
Posts: 6910
Joined: Mon May 21, 2007 9:42 pm

Post by Paul Barker » Tue Mar 13, 2012 2:58 pm

andrew Ivimey wrote:Through body stringing means a different bridge piece which is probably better
all round than the classic arrangement.
Yes I have a Chinease trad style ash tray on it's way with the holes in it. Best I suppose is mount it guided by the pickup route and drill through said holes.

User avatar
Paul Barker
No idea why I do this anymore
Posts: 6910
Joined: Mon May 21, 2007 9:42 pm

Post by Paul Barker » Tue Mar 13, 2012 3:10 pm

Here are the two bodies I am working on. the one on the left I like best as the grain seems better. It is Alder. the one on the right they didn't say what wood it was. Looks like pitch pine but has no nots so your guess is as good as mine. Might it be Ash? What I find odd is on forums they say Ash has better grain than Alder. I like the Alder much more out of these two.

My mistake I put low bids on two and won them both. Woops.

this is the very beginning of my French polishing. I am still a long way from the end. right now I am giving the polish a few days to harden and shrink before sanding down again.

Image

User avatar
andrew Ivimey
No idea why I do this anymore
Posts: 6609
Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2007 8:33 am
Location: Bedford

Post by andrew Ivimey » Tue Mar 27, 2012 8:31 am

Paul did you make a comment about bridge pieces for Teles?

The modern way of stringing through teh body is far superior to the traditional bridge where two strings share the same saddle, hence three saddles or the more modern version where each strings has its own saddle but still is not strung through teh body - the strings are fixed to the bridge assembly still. The problem with the two older types is that there often isn't enough tension and the strings cause bits of the saddles to resonate - bt like a sitar sound! This happens particularly with the 1st E string. One way to cure it is to jack up the 'action' by raising the saddles but I'm not a cowboy and prefer the smooth low slung Al Dimeola way of playing the guitar. I wish my Tele strung through the body.
Philosophers have only interpreted the world - the point, however, is to change it. No it isn't ... maybe we should leave it alone for a while.

User avatar
Paul Barker
No idea why I do this anymore
Posts: 6910
Joined: Mon May 21, 2007 9:42 pm

Post by Paul Barker » Tue Mar 27, 2012 8:43 am

the bridge I have ordered has holes in it for through body stringing or can be terminated at back of saddle. So I'll just drill righ through the body through those holes once it is mounted.

But it has the shared saddles. Was that not how the original Fender Ash Tray was configured?

Is this original? because the Chinease one I ordered is like that.

The project has taken a back seat, beginning to wish I had decided for Danish rather than Shellac. It might look rather patchy. But what hay, sound shouldn't be any worse whether patchy or professional looking.

wish I could afford that proper neck though!

User avatar
andrew Ivimey
No idea why I do this anymore
Posts: 6609
Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2007 8:33 am
Location: Bedford

Post by andrew Ivimey » Tue Mar 27, 2012 4:48 pm

Yep that's the original config and you are doing the right thing to string through the body.
Philosophers have only interpreted the world - the point, however, is to change it. No it isn't ... maybe we should leave it alone for a while.

User avatar
The Stratmangler
Needs to get out more
Posts: 1811
Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2007 1:50 pm
Location: Rossendale, Lancashire

Post by The Stratmangler » Tue Mar 27, 2012 5:28 pm

If you don't use a traditional Tele bridge you won't get a proper Tele sound - those shared saddles are fundamental, and contribute greatly to the ballsiness of the Tele.

Intonation is compromised, but that's the way it has to be.
Jerry Donohue told me :)
Chris :happy3:

User avatar
Nick
Site Admin
Posts: 11413
Joined: Sun May 06, 2007 10:20 am
Location: West Yorkshire

Post by Nick » Tue Mar 27, 2012 5:35 pm

To echo what Chris said

Original bridge = Paper in oil + iron
Modern bridge = SS Constant Current Source

Just saying :-)
Resistance isn't futile it's V / I.

Post Reply