SLOB project

Dedicated to those large boxes at one end of the room
User avatar
IslandPink
Amstrad Tower of Power
Posts: 10041
Joined: Tue May 29, 2007 7:01 pm
Location: Denbigh, N.Wales

#46 Re: SLOB project

Post by IslandPink »

I've got the kit we need, maybe we can arrange something if I'm heading down that way. I would like to hear these too, ears are the final arbiter !
"Once you find out ... the Circumstances ; then you can go out"
User avatar
Ali Tait
Eternally single
Posts: 4374
Joined: Fri Jun 08, 2007 8:10 pm
Location: Galashiels

#47 Re: SLOB project

Post by Ali Tait »

Ray, I have a couple of miniDSP in storage. Getting them is not so easy as its only open during the week. See what I can do.
User avatar
Ray P
No idea why I do this anymore
Posts: 6294
Joined: Thu Nov 22, 2007 5:18 pm
Location: Somerset

#48 Re: SLOB project

Post by Ray P »

IslandPink wrote: Thu Dec 19, 2019 9:55 am I've got the kit we need, maybe we can arrange something if I'm heading down that way. I would like to hear these too, ears are the final arbiter !
Let's sort something out in the new year Mark - as Judy, my partner, isn't in the best of health it might be easier to come up to you - I'll be interested in your experiments anyway.
Sorry, I couldn't resist!
User avatar
Ray P
No idea why I do this anymore
Posts: 6294
Joined: Thu Nov 22, 2007 5:18 pm
Location: Somerset

#49 Re: SLOB project

Post by Ray P »

Ali Tait wrote: Thu Dec 19, 2019 12:52 pm Ray, I have a couple of miniDSP in storage. Getting them is not so easy as its only open during the week. See what I can do.
That's really kind of you Ali - don't put yourself to any trouble though as there's plenty of time before I'll need to experiment.

As and when...
Sorry, I couldn't resist!
Wolfgang
Old Hand
Posts: 229
Joined: Mon May 07, 2018 3:08 pm

#50 Re: SLOB project

Post by Wolfgang »

I think this is closely related to Ray’s SLOB project. Following this thread raised the question about the best x-over again.

Some years ago I tried an OB with the PM6A in combination with my La Scala bass horns but always felt that the speed was lacking behind the bass. So I tried a midBLH with the PM6A and the speed problem was no longer there.
I wanted the full sound character of the OTLs but neither a simple 6dB passive x-over with high quality parts nor the Behringer Ultradrive could deliver it in comparison to single driver BLHs. I am still wondering if a tube based x-over would do a better job regarding the "sound character".

Does anybody know the P. Millett tube based x-over? There are still some PCBs available on ebay.
http://www.pmillett.com/tube_active_crossover.htm
User avatar
pre65
Amstrad Tower of Power
Posts: 21373
Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2007 11:13 pm
Location: North Essex/Suffolk border.

#51 Re: SLOB project

Post by pre65 »

Just seen these on the HFC web site, a new product to them.

https://www.hificollective.co.uk/drive- ... 0-neo.html
The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.

Edmund Burke

G-Popz THE easy listening connoisseur. (Philip)
User avatar
Toppsy
Shed dweller
Posts: 2400
Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2007 12:10 pm
Location: red rose country

#52 Re: SLOB project

Post by Toppsy »

pre65 wrote: Fri Dec 20, 2019 3:35 pm Just seen these on the HFC web site, a new product to them.

https://www.hificollective.co.uk/drive- ... 0-neo.html
Have you seen the asking price for a pair of these drivers? £4300 a pair excluding VAT + p&p :shock:
So Phil, you gonna be the first to take the plunge and give us a review how they sound on your own OB speakers?
User avatar
pre65
Amstrad Tower of Power
Posts: 21373
Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2007 11:13 pm
Location: North Essex/Suffolk border.

#53 Re: SLOB project

Post by pre65 »

WOW !!!!

I only had a quick look and I thought it was £430.00. :oops: :oops: :oops:
The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.

Edmund Burke

G-Popz THE easy listening connoisseur. (Philip)
User avatar
Ray P
No idea why I do this anymore
Posts: 6294
Joined: Thu Nov 22, 2007 5:18 pm
Location: Somerset

#54 Re: SLOB project

Post by Ray P »

I was wondering earlier why you had posted that link Phil!
Sorry, I couldn't resist!
User avatar
IslandPink
Amstrad Tower of Power
Posts: 10041
Joined: Tue May 29, 2007 7:01 pm
Location: Denbigh, N.Wales

#55 Re: SLOB project

Post by IslandPink »

Still cheaper than a pair of AER's, hard to believe !
"Once you find out ... the Circumstances ; then you can go out"
User avatar
Ray P
No idea why I do this anymore
Posts: 6294
Joined: Thu Nov 22, 2007 5:18 pm
Location: Somerset

#56 Re: SLOB project

Post by Ray P »

Wolfgang wrote: Fri Dec 20, 2019 3:11 pm I think this is closely related to Ray’s SLOB project. Following this thread raised the question about the best x-over again.

Some years ago I tried an OB with the PM6A in combination with my La Scala bass horns but always felt that the speed was lacking behind the bass. So I tried a midBLH with the PM6A and the speed problem was no longer there.
I wanted the full sound character of the OTLs but neither a simple 6dB passive x-over with high quality parts nor the Behringer Ultradrive could deliver it in comparison to single driver BLHs. I am still wondering if a tube based x-over would do a better job regarding the "sound character".

Does anybody know the P. Millett tube based x-over? There are still some PCBs available on ebay.
http://www.pmillett.com/tube_active_crossover.htm
Hi Wolfgang. My plan is to not hamper the full range drive unit with any passive crossover components and aim for an active crossover. That should mean the OTL amp connects directly to the full range unit and should even have an easier time because it's relieved of low-end bass duty.

There seem to be many ways to approach the crossover requirement but I'm gradually narrowing it dowwn as I read around the subject. One approach I'm contemplating is that as an HQPlayer I have the opton of using its convolution option to apply any room correction I may want, meaning I can keep the crossover to simply defining the roll-off slopes.
Sorry, I couldn't resist!
User avatar
IslandPink
Amstrad Tower of Power
Posts: 10041
Joined: Tue May 29, 2007 7:01 pm
Location: Denbigh, N.Wales

#57 Re: SLOB project

Post by IslandPink »

I think you might be wise to experiment with a high-pass for the Lii driver on OB, even if it's only at 100 or 120Hz. As you can see from the plot I showed on the first page, it will go down below 60Hz , where the excursion could get quite significant. Their recommended enclosure would limit the bass excursion somewhat, unlike OB. You can easily try this with a smaller coupling cap in the OTL amp.
"Once you find out ... the Circumstances ; then you can go out"
User avatar
Ray P
No idea why I do this anymore
Posts: 6294
Joined: Thu Nov 22, 2007 5:18 pm
Location: Somerset

#58 Re: SLOB project

Post by Ray P »

IslandPink wrote: Fri Dec 20, 2019 10:14 pm I think you might be wise to experiment with a high-pass for the Lii driver on OB, even if it's only at 100 or 120Hz. As you can see from the plot I showed on the first page, it will go down below 60Hz , where the excursion could get quite significant. Their recommended enclosure would limit the bass excursion somewhat, unlike OB. You can easily try this with a smaller coupling cap in the OTL amp.
That is what I plan to do Mark but have assumed the active crossover would take care of it and hadn't considered that the amp's output cap already offers the option of a high-pass filter, however that gives a very slow roll-off and I'm not sure it would be sufficient? For example, assuming the drive unit is an 8ohm load, a 1000uF output cap gives an optimal LF response of about 200Hz but it's only 3dB down at 20Hz?
Sorry, I couldn't resist!
User avatar
IslandPink
Amstrad Tower of Power
Posts: 10041
Joined: Tue May 29, 2007 7:01 pm
Location: Denbigh, N.Wales

#59 Re: SLOB project

Post by IslandPink »

It would be a shame to use an active crossover into a super-transparent OTL amp and a FR driver - you're limiting your sound quality from the start.
Ray P wrote: Sat Dec 21, 2019 4:24 am ....a 1000uF output cap gives an optimal LF response of about 200Hz but it's only 3dB down at 20Hz?
I don't understand what you mean by optimal response about 200Hz, when it's 3dB down at 20Hz. I'm suggest you try sizing the cap (smaller ) eg. for 3dB down at 100Hz in which case it's about 9dB down at 50Hz. Is the output cap the only coupling cap ? - Is there not one between driver and output valves, that would be a smaller thing and easier to swap ?
"Once you find out ... the Circumstances ; then you can go out"
User avatar
Ray P
No idea why I do this anymore
Posts: 6294
Joined: Thu Nov 22, 2007 5:18 pm
Location: Somerset

#60 Re: SLOB project

Post by Ray P »

IslandPink wrote: Sat Dec 21, 2019 12:27 pm It would be a shame to use an active crossover into a super-transparent OTL amp and a FR driver - you're limiting your sound quality from the start.
Ray P wrote: Sat Dec 21, 2019 4:24 am ....a 1000uF output cap gives an optimal LF response of about 200Hz but it's only 3dB down at 20Hz?
I don't understand what you mean by optimal response about 200Hz, when it's 3dB down at 20Hz. I'm suggest you try sizing the cap (smaller ) eg. for 3dB down at 100Hz in which case it's about 9dB down at 50Hz. Is the output cap the only coupling cap ? - Is there not one between driver and output valves, that would be a smaller thing and easier to swap ?
Sorry Mark, didn't sleep well last night and it was probably not a good idea to be posting at half past four in the morning as my thinking and communication were clearly pretty confused! I'll try again.

Ideally I would like to do as you suggest and run the full-range driver straight of the OTL amp outputs but my thinking until now had been along the lines of needing to roll-off the unit at the bottom end and I hadn't thought beyond the active crossover approach but your suggestion has nudged the thinking along several notches.

The bit where I really was sleep-walking was the cap calculations. I used this cap calculator but I have no real idea why I put those values in to it;

https://www.v-cap.com/coupling-capacitor-calculator.php

The calculator notes talk about phase anomalies around the corner frequency and recommends a rule of thumb of using a corner frequency a tenth of your target frequency to avoid the anomalies and I think that's what adled my brain. Anyway. a -3dB frequency at 100Hz requires an output cap of around 200uF (which puts it into plastic film cap territory). So bandwidth limiting the OTL woud just leave the problem of balancing the bass unit to fill in at the bottom end.

Cheers Mark and thanks for being patient.
Sorry, I couldn't resist!
Post Reply