Daniel Quinn wrote: ↑Tue Feb 21, 2017 10:05 amOn my way to a court hearing at stockport cc i do hope your legal friend is my opposition as s/he knows nothing.pre65 wrote: ↑Tue Feb 21, 2017 9:08 amI showed this sad saga to a legal friend of mine, and his opinion was that Richard had no actual proof that it was Greg who had removed the lid so there was not a case for criminal damage. There was however, grounds for a case of libel towards Greg.Daniel Quinn wrote: ↑Tue Feb 21, 2017 8:52 amI Dont like this thread so i will read it and offer up my dislike just like several people already.
Go figure. What is it about these people thst they think it isneccessary to post thier disaproval.
The saturday guardian as multiple sections. Several of them i do not read. I appreciate other readers do
He suggested a full public apology from Richard to Greg would be in order.
Firstly this is a civil matter and there is sufficient evidence for a judicial finding of facts
Secondly. I buggered if i can see any actionable defamation.
Why are you continuing to stir this? We aren't interested. We want to discuss hifi!!!!