Audiojumble

Michael L
Old Hand
Posts: 465
Joined: Tue Feb 19, 2013 5:10 pm
Location: Shrewsbury

Re: Audiojumble

Post by Michael L » Tue Feb 21, 2017 10:08 am

Daniel Quinn wrote:
Tue Feb 21, 2017 10:05 am
pre65 wrote:
Tue Feb 21, 2017 9:08 am
Daniel Quinn wrote:
Tue Feb 21, 2017 8:52 am
I Dont like this thread so i will read it and offer up my dislike just like several people already.

Go figure. What is it about these people thst they think it isneccessary to post thier disaproval.

The saturday guardian as multiple sections. Several of them i do not read. I appreciate other readers do
I showed this sad saga to a legal friend of mine, and his opinion was that Richard had no actual proof that it was Greg who had removed the lid so there was not a case for criminal damage. There was however, grounds for a case of libel towards Greg.

He suggested a full public apology from Richard to Greg would be in order.
On my way to a court hearing at stockport cc i do hope your legal friend is my opposition as s/he knows nothing.

Firstly this is a civil matter and there is sufficient evidence for a judicial finding of facts

Secondly. I buggered if i can see any actionable defamation.

Why are you continuing to stir this? We aren't interested. We want to discuss hifi!!!!

User avatar
Dr Bunsen Honeydew
Old Hand
Posts: 1358
Joined: Mon Sep 21, 2009 10:50 am
Location: Muppet Labs

Re: Audiojumble

Post by Dr Bunsen Honeydew » Tue Feb 21, 2017 10:09 am

And again another of the Clan joins in with Shane putting in an appearance. There are only a very small number of them but the same ones turn up every time. Am I imagining it - no, provable in the archive.

I suppose I have to answer him :roll: and look how I was proved to be right!!!!!

Michael L
Old Hand
Posts: 465
Joined: Tue Feb 19, 2013 5:10 pm
Location: Shrewsbury

Re: Audiojumble

Post by Michael L » Tue Feb 21, 2017 10:11 am

Dr Bunsen Honeydew wrote:
Tue Feb 21, 2017 10:09 am
And again another of the Clan joins in with Shane putting in an appearance. There are only a very small number of them but the same ones turn up every time. Am I imagining it - no, provable in the archive.

I suppose I have to answer him :roll: and look how I was proved to be right!!!!!

Give me strength!

User avatar
Dr Bunsen Honeydew
Old Hand
Posts: 1358
Joined: Mon Sep 21, 2009 10:50 am
Location: Muppet Labs

Re: Audiojumble

Post by Dr Bunsen Honeydew » Tue Feb 21, 2017 10:16 am

Michael L wrote:
Tue Feb 21, 2017 10:08 am
Daniel Quinn wrote:
Tue Feb 21, 2017 10:05 am
pre65 wrote:
Tue Feb 21, 2017 9:08 am


I showed this sad saga to a legal friend of mine, and his opinion was that Richard had no actual proof that it was Greg who had removed the lid so there was not a case for criminal damage. There was however, grounds for a case of libel towards Greg.

He suggested a full public apology from Richard to Greg would be in order.
On my way to a court hearing at stockport cc i do hope your legal friend is my opposition as s/he knows nothing.

Firstly this is a civil matter and there is sufficient evidence for a judicial finding of facts

Secondly. I buggered if i can see any actionable defamation.

Why are you continuing to stir this? We aren't interested. We want to discuss hifi!!!!
DQ is a real solicitor, you have been given real free :mrgreen: advice. Do you want to take it, or is it that his post is so correct and unchallengeable and puts Noddy in his place so the subject has to be changed to him (ad hominem). DQ is not the subject here, this is the game playing that causes these problems, it is the same as is done to me by these people, so NORMAL members will see this as an example.

The clan so far joining in here - Noddy, Michael L, Greg, Shane. Just the same old same old same old, still a couple to turn up.

Daniel Quinn
Old Hand
Posts: 267
Joined: Thu Jan 05, 2017 9:19 am

Re: Audiojumble

Post by Daniel Quinn » Tue Feb 21, 2017 10:19 am

Mr l. You expect me to leave pres incorrect retort to my post stand as is. Dont be silly

Your blaming the wrong preston.
Last edited by Daniel Quinn on Tue Feb 21, 2017 10:34 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Dr Bunsen Honeydew
Old Hand
Posts: 1358
Joined: Mon Sep 21, 2009 10:50 am
Location: Muppet Labs

Re: Audiojumble

Post by Dr Bunsen Honeydew » Tue Feb 21, 2017 10:22 am

Previous post changed so my post no longer applies.
Last edited by Dr Bunsen Honeydew on Tue Feb 21, 2017 10:37 am, edited 1 time in total.

Daniel Quinn
Old Hand
Posts: 267
Joined: Thu Jan 05, 2017 9:19 am

Re: Audiojumble

Post by Daniel Quinn » Tue Feb 21, 2017 10:35 am

Oops wrong name :D

User avatar
Dr Bunsen Honeydew
Old Hand
Posts: 1358
Joined: Mon Sep 21, 2009 10:50 am
Location: Muppet Labs

Re: Audiojumble

Post by Dr Bunsen Honeydew » Tue Feb 21, 2017 10:39 am

I wouldn't have been surprised if Cagey is here, he loves to play these games.

User avatar
Dr Bunsen Honeydew
Old Hand
Posts: 1358
Joined: Mon Sep 21, 2009 10:50 am
Location: Muppet Labs

Re: Audiojumble

Post by Dr Bunsen Honeydew » Tue Feb 21, 2017 10:40 am

I will do a deal with you all. I will shut up if I have nothing to respond to and this spat can quietly die - so let us see.

User avatar
shane
Shed dweller
Posts: 2788
Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2007 12:09 pm
Location: Kept in a cool dry place.

Re: Audiojumble

Post by shane » Tue Feb 21, 2017 10:43 am

Dr Bunsen Honeydew wrote:
Tue Feb 21, 2017 10:09 am
And again another of the Clan joins in with Shane putting in an appearance. There are only a very small number of them but the same ones turn up every time. Am I imagining it - no, provable in the archive.

I suppose I have to answer him :roll: and look how I was proved to be right!!!!!
Oh for gods sake grow up, will you? I'm not part of some great anti-Richard campaign, and I don't suppose anyone else is either. You don't figure in my life at all other than as someone who seems to be hell bent on turning a forum I care deeply about into a cesspit. I have no history with you and no idea what "archive" you're talking about. I'm simply fed up to the back teeth with having to wade through pages of your tiresome self aggrandising drivel in order to follow the forum. I care little for you or your company, and I couldn't care less about what happens to either. You have a massively overinflated idea of your own importance, and if you can't see how much damage you do to yourself by airing all this crap in public then you're also a fool. Just go away and pollute another forum and you will never hear from me again.
A camel is a horse designed by a committee.

User avatar
Dr Bunsen Honeydew
Old Hand
Posts: 1358
Joined: Mon Sep 21, 2009 10:50 am
Location: Muppet Labs

Re: Audiojumble

Post by Dr Bunsen Honeydew » Tue Feb 21, 2017 10:56 am

You see I am forced to respond.

Now if you don't care you wouldn't appear every time there is an opportunity, and you do, as is provable in the archive (archive is back posts held on the this forum and others).

So once again the only purpose for this is to create more conflict, why? why do you want that conflict. Must people are reading this and just rolling their eyes at the stupidity, but you have to join in. So you shoot yourself in the foot with your own words.

User avatar
Nick
Site Admin
Posts: 11292
Joined: Sun May 06, 2007 10:20 am
Location: West Yorkshire

Re: Audiojumble

Post by Nick » Tue Feb 21, 2017 10:59 am

Would it help if I had the last word?
Resistance isn't futile it's V / I.

User avatar
Dr Bunsen Honeydew
Old Hand
Posts: 1358
Joined: Mon Sep 21, 2009 10:50 am
Location: Muppet Labs

Re: Audiojumble

Post by Dr Bunsen Honeydew » Tue Feb 21, 2017 11:00 am

Again I will make the offer to shut up, just so everyone can see the truth in this stupid little game.

Nick, yes please. make it a good word.

User avatar
Nick
Site Admin
Posts: 11292
Joined: Sun May 06, 2007 10:20 am
Location: West Yorkshire

Re: Audiojumble

Post by Nick » Tue Feb 21, 2017 11:06 am

"onomatopoeia", that's a good word. Also a good song.
Resistance isn't futile it's V / I.

User avatar
shane
Shed dweller
Posts: 2788
Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2007 12:09 pm
Location: Kept in a cool dry place.

Re: Audiojumble

Post by shane » Tue Feb 21, 2017 11:06 am

You really can't see it, can you? You really believe that the whole world is out to get you. As I said, I don't care about you, but I do care about this forum. When you were here before, there was conflict here. Then for years there was none, then yo come back and bring it all back with you. Like it or not, you and you alone cause the conflict that surrounds you. It follows you wherever you go, and until you do something about it, it always will. As I said though, that doesn't bother me in the least. Just go somewhere else and do it, will you?

As far as I'm aware I've never had any interaction with you on any other forum, although doubtless you'll trawl up some insignificant comment from somewhere and brand me a liar, as you're so fond of doing.
A camel is a horse designed by a committee.

Post Reply