Are valves only for the rich ?????
- MrAcoustat
- User
- Posts: 35
- Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2012 8:32 am
#1 Are valves only for the rich ?????
Are valves only for the rich ????? the answer is NO but if you are like me with 81 db speakers STAY AWAY unless you are wealthy don't get me wrong i love tube sound but with inefficient speakers the maintenance is expensive the more power you need the more expensive good quality tubes are plain and simple.
- pre65
- Amstrad Tower of Power
- Posts: 21399
- Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2007 11:13 pm
- Location: North Essex/Suffolk border.
#2
Well, there ARE valves that might be capable of what you need, and not that expensive to boot.
The 833a (GU_48 Russian) is a monster powerhouse if implemented correctly.
The way I use it the thing is not even ticking over, and it really does sound good.
You can certainly DIY one for a veritable fraction of the price that Wavec charge. (might not look as pretty though )
The 833a (GU_48 Russian) is a monster powerhouse if implemented correctly.
The way I use it the thing is not even ticking over, and it really does sound good.
You can certainly DIY one for a veritable fraction of the price that Wavec charge. (might not look as pretty though )
Last edited by pre65 on Mon Jul 16, 2012 11:23 am, edited 1 time in total.
The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.
Edmund Burke
G-Popz THE easy listening connoisseur. (Philip)
Edmund Burke
G-Popz THE easy listening connoisseur. (Philip)
- shane
- Social outcast
- Posts: 3405
- Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2007 12:09 pm
- Location: Kept in a cool dry place.
#3 Re: Are valves only for the rich ?????
I'll bear that in mind.MrAcoustat wrote: if you are like me with 81 db speakers STAY AWAY unless you are wealthy
- MrAcoustat
- User
- Posts: 35
- Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2012 8:32 am
#4 Re: Are valves only for the rich ?????
50 watts per channel pure class A amplifier with very good tubes needed retubing after 10 months $1,200.00 sorry but i'm not wealthy.shane wrote:I'll bear that in mind.MrAcoustat wrote: if you are like me with 81 db speakers STAY AWAY unless you are wealthy
- pre65
- Amstrad Tower of Power
- Posts: 21399
- Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2007 11:13 pm
- Location: North Essex/Suffolk border.
#5 Re: Are valves only for the rich ?????
What amp, and what tubes (valves ) are you referring to ?MrAcoustat wrote:
50 watts per channel pure class A amplifier with very good tubes needed retubing after 10 months $1,200.00 sorry but i'm not wealthy.
The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.
Edmund Burke
G-Popz THE easy listening connoisseur. (Philip)
Edmund Burke
G-Popz THE easy listening connoisseur. (Philip)
- MrAcoustat
- User
- Posts: 35
- Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2012 8:32 am
#6 Re: Are valves only for the rich ?????
pre65 wrote:What amp, and what tubes (valves ) are you referring to ?MrAcoustat wrote:
50 watts per channel pure class A amplifier with very good tubes needed retubing after 10 months $1,200.00 sorry but i'm not wealthy.
Grant Fidelity Rita-880 available with normal tubes for $300.00 good tubes for $750.00 or the very best for $1,250.00 KT-88s Psvane HIFI series
- MrAcoustat
- User
- Posts: 35
- Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2012 8:32 am
#7
If you notice because of the weight on the cabinet amplifier 110 pounds cd player 45 pounds i had my friend build me a new audio rack because the one i had was pretty cheap the new one is STRONG and i also find it very nice it weighs 300 pounds on a ciment floor it's not going anywhere.
- Mike H
- Amstrad Tower of Power
- Posts: 20189
- Joined: Sat Oct 04, 2008 5:38 pm
- Location: The Fens
- Contact:
#8
Unfortunately the most popular types are priced accordingly, it's supply and demand. That's hellish expensive for KT88's though, they're not that marvellous.
"No matter how fast light travels it finds that the darkness has always got there first, and is waiting for it."
- pre65
- Amstrad Tower of Power
- Posts: 21399
- Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2007 11:13 pm
- Location: North Essex/Suffolk border.
#10
Agree with Mike, those prices are just taking the piss, perhaps for Audiofools ?
At the end of the day we all make choices based on what we know (or think we know ).
If you are happy with solid state amps then that's good.
At the end of the day we all make choices based on what we know (or think we know ).
If you are happy with solid state amps then that's good.
The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.
Edmund Burke
G-Popz THE easy listening connoisseur. (Philip)
Edmund Burke
G-Popz THE easy listening connoisseur. (Philip)
- MrAcoustat
- User
- Posts: 35
- Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2012 8:32 am
#11
Yes Mike each channel = 2xKT-88 - 1x6SL7 - 1x6SN7Mike H wrote:Looks like 2 x KT88 per channel?
Yes i'm very happy with my Chord CPM-2600
- colin.hepburn
- Shed dweller
- Posts: 2294
- Joined: Sat Jun 02, 2007 1:24 am
- Location: Scotland Aberdeenshire
#12
Psvane tubes were made by Shuguang tube factory under contract so in my view same valve/tube just made to look pretty my Shuguang KT66s cost about £35.00 matched pair so I think you are just paying silly money for a name and looks
http://psvanetube.com/wordpress/who-is-psvane/
PS just my views on this
http://psvanetube.com/wordpress/who-is-psvane/
PS just my views on this
- Mike H
- Amstrad Tower of Power
- Posts: 20189
- Joined: Sat Oct 04, 2008 5:38 pm
- Location: The Fens
- Contact:
#13
I didn't want to write it in so many words for fear of offending somebody but that did occur to me also.
Sure you could get some decent Hong-Kong ones off eBay or something like. If you're really lucky, maybe original NOS
It sez 'class A', is this single-ended or push-pull? I can work out how it could do it push-pull no problem.
If the KT88's are failing could be the anode power dissipation is too high? Well 'borderline' - it's the typical reason - if it were possible to reduce the biased DC current I'm sure it ought to lengthen the working life, maybe
Sure you could get some decent Hong-Kong ones off eBay or something like. If you're really lucky, maybe original NOS
It sez 'class A', is this single-ended or push-pull? I can work out how it could do it push-pull no problem.
If the KT88's are failing could be the anode power dissipation is too high? Well 'borderline' - it's the typical reason - if it were possible to reduce the biased DC current I'm sure it ought to lengthen the working life, maybe
"No matter how fast light travels it finds that the darkness has always got there first, and is waiting for it."
- MrAcoustat
- User
- Posts: 35
- Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2012 8:32 am
#14
No brainer for me, bought the amp with the good tubes not the best one's so i never did spend the BIG bucks and this was one of the reasons i went back to solid state and i am very happy with my Chord CPM-2600.
PS: 81db is hard on ANY amp but on tubes their life is short and it's normal.
PS: 81db is hard on ANY amp but on tubes their life is short and it's normal.
- Mike H
- Amstrad Tower of Power
- Posts: 20189
- Joined: Sat Oct 04, 2008 5:38 pm
- Location: The Fens
- Contact:
#15
Not sure about that, I have power tubes that have lasted for yonks and others only a few months, which, coincidentally, are typically newer manufacture, given what they might cost that is unacceptable to me. If one lot can do it, why not the other?
Not sure the "81dB" bit has much to do with it either, if it's class A the o/p tubes are pretty much working flat-out all the time. In terms of, the 'idle' current is high. (Higher than it can be done with equivalent class AB push-pull for example.)
I'm assuming the KT88's are failing somehow, any visible symptoms?
Not sure the "81dB" bit has much to do with it either, if it's class A the o/p tubes are pretty much working flat-out all the time. In terms of, the 'idle' current is high. (Higher than it can be done with equivalent class AB push-pull for example.)
I'm assuming the KT88's are failing somehow, any visible symptoms?
"No matter how fast light travels it finds that the darkness has always got there first, and is waiting for it."