'E'-Choke
-
- Old Hand
- Posts: 780
- Joined: Thu Jun 07, 2007 2:32 pm
- Location: sheffield
#151
i've got some of these on order to try
http://www.diyhifisupply.com/node/473
10uF film and not too expensive
Mike sent 10uF lytics with my fetregs
http://www.diyhifisupply.com/node/473
10uF film and not too expensive
Mike sent 10uF lytics with my fetregs
-
- Old Hand
- Posts: 780
- Joined: Thu Jun 07, 2007 2:32 pm
- Location: sheffield
#153
Replaced the C1 10uF electrolytic caps with the 10uF film caps today.
A very noticeable difference
When i fitted the E-chokes i was so taken and pleased with the improvement in timing/portrayal of rhythm i hadn't admitted to myself that the timbre (quality of a musical note or sound or tone that distinguishes it from others at the same frequency) had gone to shit.
Anyway, fitting the film caps seems to have fixed it
A very noticeable difference
When i fitted the E-chokes i was so taken and pleased with the improvement in timing/portrayal of rhythm i hadn't admitted to myself that the timbre (quality of a musical note or sound or tone that distinguishes it from others at the same frequency) had gone to shit.
Anyway, fitting the film caps seems to have fixed it
-
- Old Hand
- Posts: 780
- Joined: Thu Jun 07, 2007 2:32 pm
- Location: sheffield
#155
Well its possible i imagined it i suppose. Experience is relative after all. That's the value of fests and direct comparisons.
i have to admit i changed the value of the 300B cathode resistor and the anode load resistor for the 6SH7 driver valve at the same time (to match the other mono). But this was only on one amp. I guess i should reverse that and see if the difference is still there.
Or even better someone else try the same thing.....
Going to Blackgate Wkz in the power supplies (a long time ago) made a big difference to me in these amps. Perhaps there wouldn't be such a noticeable difference with power supplies with normal electrolytics. Particularly after the e-choke ?
i have to admit i changed the value of the 300B cathode resistor and the anode load resistor for the 6SH7 driver valve at the same time (to match the other mono). But this was only on one amp. I guess i should reverse that and see if the difference is still there.
Or even better someone else try the same thing.....
Going to Blackgate Wkz in the power supplies (a long time ago) made a big difference to me in these amps. Perhaps there wouldn't be such a noticeable difference with power supplies with normal electrolytics. Particularly after the e-choke ?
- Mike H
- Amstrad Tower of Power
- Posts: 20189
- Joined: Sat Oct 04, 2008 5:38 pm
- Location: The Fens
- Contact:
#156
This is all very interesting because it seems to confirm my own findings (for want of a word ) about effects different passives can have ~ e.g. as 300B's can be quite sensitive about what's connected to their filaments, that part is quite plausible.
Wouldn't have thought that the type of CG would have that much effect being separated on the input side of a MOSFET gate which in turn is separated by a resistor from the final output, so I wonder if it's something else ~ personally I've tried the original 1uF polyprop, an ancient 1980's 500V 10uF and finally a Panasonic, can't remember any producing a noticeable difference compared to another, but then of course lots of other things changed in the meantime as well
Wouldn't have thought that the type of CG would have that much effect being separated on the input side of a MOSFET gate which in turn is separated by a resistor from the final output, so I wonder if it's something else ~ personally I've tried the original 1uF polyprop, an ancient 1980's 500V 10uF and finally a Panasonic, can't remember any producing a noticeable difference compared to another, but then of course lots of other things changed in the meantime as well
"No matter how fast light travels it finds that the darkness has always got there first, and is waiting for it."
-
- Old Hand
- Posts: 780
- Joined: Thu Jun 07, 2007 2:32 pm
- Location: sheffield
#157
But the way you explained it to me (and i may have got hold of the wrong end of the stick completly here) : C1 provides a reference voltage on a high impeadance feed. If that is the case then any noise here would surely have an effect on the output ?Mike H wrote:Wouldn't have thought that the type of CG would have that much effect being separated on the input side of a MOSFET gate which in turn is separated by a resistor from the final output, so I wonder if it's something else ~ personally I've tried the original 1uF polyprop, an ancient 1980's 500V 10uF and finally a Panasonic, can't remember any producing a noticeable difference compared to another, but then of course lots of other things changed in the meantime as well
I'm gonna have to go back and try this in a more controlled way to see what caused the change.
- Mike H
- Amstrad Tower of Power
- Posts: 20189
- Joined: Sat Oct 04, 2008 5:38 pm
- Location: The Fens
- Contact:
#158
I would think so yes - although there is now also a RC filter of 10k > 1nF, the 1nF being between gate and source.
"No matter how fast light travels it finds that the darkness has always got there first, and is waiting for it."
#159
[
#2.
The fuse is a problem. Somewhere there's a thread where Nick mentioned something about a fuse doing something because it's thin wire ~ you know like feeding a speaker with thin wires, boosts the treble and cuts the bass? Same sort of thing here.
i have juat modded my E CHOKE, yes better without fuse
#2.
The fuse is a problem. Somewhere there's a thread where Nick mentioned something about a fuse doing something because it's thin wire ~ you know like feeding a speaker with thin wires, boosts the treble and cuts the bass? Same sort of thing here.
i have juat modded my E CHOKE, yes better without fuse
- Mike H
- Amstrad Tower of Power
- Posts: 20189
- Joined: Sat Oct 04, 2008 5:38 pm
- Location: The Fens
- Contact:
#160
Good lord you still using that version?
Yes fuse was replaced with 10R 2W resistor, and the cap on 'CF' moved to 'OUT'
Yes fuse was replaced with 10R 2W resistor, and the cap on 'CF' moved to 'OUT'
"No matter how fast light travels it finds that the darkness has always got there first, and is waiting for it."
- Mike H
- Amstrad Tower of Power
- Posts: 20189
- Joined: Sat Oct 04, 2008 5:38 pm
- Location: The Fens
- Contact:
#162
I concur. I was relatively slow to find this out as I was already using a polyprop after the fuse right from the "off"
"No matter how fast light travels it finds that the darkness has always got there first, and is waiting for it."
-
- Shed dweller
- Posts: 2300
- Joined: Fri Aug 03, 2007 10:57 am
- Location: From the land of the Bodgers
#164
Hmmm, seems OK with 1K for R6 and 1K stops the oscillation if I put a cap directly on the input.
Current config is now SS rec > 50uF > 75R dropper > 50uF > Regulator > 250uF
5v pk-pk in, 2mV pk-pk out... -68db
Not replaced the fuse with 10R and C1 is at 1uF, CG 47uF
Current config is now SS rec > 50uF > 75R dropper > 50uF > Regulator > 250uF
5v pk-pk in, 2mV pk-pk out... -68db
Not replaced the fuse with 10R and C1 is at 1uF, CG 47uF
- Mike H
- Amstrad Tower of Power
- Posts: 20189
- Joined: Sat Oct 04, 2008 5:38 pm
- Location: The Fens
- Contact:
#165
Ah well D1 was changed to 1N4006 - 1N4007 ?
So I'm guessing the max. reverse Voltage is being exceeded across D1.
If R6 = 1k means CG is being charged faster through the MOSFET Zener (200V, IRFB240?) then D2 & R6, as well as VDR1 & R3 thus keeping the Voltage lower across the latter two and D1.
This is the latest version which should help:
So I'm guessing the max. reverse Voltage is being exceeded across D1.
If R6 = 1k means CG is being charged faster through the MOSFET Zener (200V, IRFB240?) then D2 & R6, as well as VDR1 & R3 thus keeping the Voltage lower across the latter two and D1.
This is the latest version which should help:
"No matter how fast light travels it finds that the darkness has always got there first, and is waiting for it."