SLOB project
#91 Re: SLOB project
Thanks Steve, I had assumed it was something to do with those other 'ms parameters. Rms doesn't seem to appear on a lot of loudspeaker datasheets though, is there a way to derive it?
Cheers
Cheers
Sorry, I couldn't resist!
- Cressy Snr
- Amstrad Tower of Power
- Posts: 10581
- Joined: Wed May 30, 2007 12:25 am
- Location: South Yorks.
#92 Re: SLOB project
Well here is the formula for calculating Qms, which includes the Rms term but don’t ask me how to rearrange the bloody thing for Rms. My algebra doesn’t go that far.
Sgt. Baker started talkin’ with a Bullhorn in his hand.
#93 Re: SLOB project
Just swap over Qms on the lhs with Rms on the rhs.
Rms = sqrt(Mms/Cms)/Qms
Rms = sqrt(Mms/Cms)/Qms
Whenever an honest man discovers that he's mistaken, he will either cease to be mistaken or he will cease to be honest.
#94 Re: SLOB project
Thanks Steve and Nick.
Steve, if it's any consolation, its so long since I've needed to do much algebra that I would have had to work at rearranging that too...
Ray
Steve, if it's any consolation, its so long since I've needed to do much algebra that I would have had to work at rearranging that too...
Ray
Sorry, I couldn't resist!
#95 Re: SLOB project
So it looks as though Mark isn't going to be a fan of Nelson Pass's choice of bass unit in his SLOB design;
Sorry, I couldn't resist!
-
- Thermionic Monk Status
- Posts: 5643
- Joined: Thu May 24, 2007 11:22 am
- Location: People's Republic of South Yorkshire
#96 Re: SLOB project
Steve, Ray,
If it's any help the magic key is that as long as you multiply both sides of an equation by the same thing you can multiply by anything you like. So, to make the equation read as Rms =, first multiply both sides by Rms. So the equation becomes:
Rms x Qms = Rms x 1/Rms x sqrt(Mms/Cms)
Handily the two Rms terms on the right hand side of the equation cancel (Rms÷Rms=1)
So the equation becomes:
Rms x Qms = sqrt(Mms/Cms)
The last step is to "remove" the Qms from the left hand side, so we divide both sides by Qms (or multiply both sides by 1/Qms, which is exactly the same thing). So we get:
Rms x Qms / Qms = 1/Qms x sqrt (Mms/Cms)
The Qms terms cancel again (anything divided by itself is always 1) leaving the equation Nick gave.
If it's any help the magic key is that as long as you multiply both sides of an equation by the same thing you can multiply by anything you like. So, to make the equation read as Rms =, first multiply both sides by Rms. So the equation becomes:
Rms x Qms = Rms x 1/Rms x sqrt(Mms/Cms)
Handily the two Rms terms on the right hand side of the equation cancel (Rms÷Rms=1)
So the equation becomes:
Rms x Qms = sqrt(Mms/Cms)
The last step is to "remove" the Qms from the left hand side, so we divide both sides by Qms (or multiply both sides by 1/Qms, which is exactly the same thing). So we get:
Rms x Qms / Qms = 1/Qms x sqrt (Mms/Cms)
The Qms terms cancel again (anything divided by itself is always 1) leaving the equation Nick gave.
#97 Re: SLOB project
Thanks Simon, that's helped to dislodge some dormant grey matter...
Sorry, I couldn't resist!
- IslandPink
- Amstrad Tower of Power
- Posts: 10041
- Joined: Tue May 29, 2007 7:01 pm
- Location: Denbigh, N.Wales
#98 Re: SLOB project
Good work on the maths, everyone !
I have tended to use Rms = 2.Pi.Fs.Mms/ Qms to check drivers for which it's not stated - but I see now I could use Cms for a slightly simpler calc.
See how it goes, Ray - 2.9 is not that high for modern bass drivers, it'll help at bit if you have a low-impedance SS amp driving it.
I have tended to use Rms = 2.Pi.Fs.Mms/ Qms to check drivers for which it's not stated - but I see now I could use Cms for a slightly simpler calc.
See how it goes, Ray - 2.9 is not that high for modern bass drivers, it'll help at bit if you have a low-impedance SS amp driving it.
"Once you find out ... the Circumstances ; then you can go out"
#99 Re: SLOB project
Thanks Mark. The calculation was mainly out of interest as I've already decided to stick, at least initially, with the Eminence bass drivers specified by Nelson Pass because they represent a low risk option giving known good results, especially as the Lii Audio full-ranger is already a deviation from the original. I plan to use a chip amp to power the bass driver.IslandPink wrote: ↑Fri Dec 27, 2019 1:03 pm Good work on the maths, everyone !
I have tended to use Rms = 2.Pi.Fs.Mms/ Qms to check drivers for which it's not stated - but I see now I could use Cms for a slightly simpler calc.
See how it goes, Ray - 2.9 is not that high for modern bass drivers, it'll help at bit if you have a low-impedance SS amp driving it.
Sorry, I couldn't resist!
- Cressy Snr
- Amstrad Tower of Power
- Posts: 10581
- Joined: Wed May 30, 2007 12:25 am
- Location: South Yorks.
#100 Re: SLOB project
Thanks Simon/Nick.
That helped.
That helped.
Sgt. Baker started talkin’ with a Bullhorn in his hand.
#101 Re: SLOB project
The tracking information tells me that the Lii Audio drive units are in Birmingham and should be with me on Monday or Tuesday.
Sorry, I couldn't resist!
#103 Re: SLOB project
Anyway, after some further research I found a project on AudioCircle where a guy is doing a very similar build except that he's using a Cube FC8 for the full range driver, but exactly the same Eminence bass units as I plan to use. Fortunately, he posted a schematic of the Pass LXmini active crossover with values specified by Nelson for the Eminence and Cube drivers. I reasoned that those settings won't be too far away from what I'll need so I plugged the values into Micro-Cap, which gave the following results;
I think that gives a pretty good baseline.
I think that gives a pretty good baseline.
Sorry, I couldn't resist!
- IslandPink
- Amstrad Tower of Power
- Posts: 10041
- Joined: Tue May 29, 2007 7:01 pm
- Location: Denbigh, N.Wales
#104 Re: SLOB project
Exciting times !
"Once you find out ... the Circumstances ; then you can go out"
#105 Message for Ed
Ed, I tried to reply to your PM about the Pass active crossover but it seems you've disabled PM receipt?
Ray
Ray
Sorry, I couldn't resist!