Here's the last post.
Close to you seeing that subwoofers might be needed in some cases. To reiterate - there is no midrange driver on the planet that will produce the low end that is required of this system. Do I go without the bass, or do I add subwoofers?Dr Bunsen Honeydew wrote: ↑Mon Apr 03, 2017 1:17 pmWhat the feck are you on about, close to what. This is just as stupid as the waste of time conversation with Moose. I say subs are bad for music, get the speaker right in the first place. You disagree and throw loads of mumbo jumbo at me, I say don't waste my time with it use your ears. you just continue with it not ONE mention of a piece of music. I say we are wasting our time until I can get my ears to it, but from the way you post and what you do for a living I doubt you would even recognise it. And you say we are getting close to something, yes indeed an exercise in stupiditychris661 wrote: ↑Mon Apr 03, 2017 8:28 amRight, so as soon as I get close to something, you call it a pointless discussion. I see where this is going, but for some reason I persist.Dr Bunsen Honeydew wrote: ↑Sun Apr 02, 2017 10:26 pm
Pointless discussion as I wouldn't have had a sub in the first place having established empirically that they a musically crap.
So until you can get me to listen to your system we will have to agree to differ. But as I say at the moment from your posts I would be wasting my time trying to find music.
In the context of this particular system, there is no midrange driver on the planet that would produce the bass that is required. Therefore, some help in the low frequencies is an absolute requirement. So, what's better? A system that stops at 100Hz, or one that uses subwoofers?
I can tell you which one goes out to gigs and pays the bills.
Chris
Music is sound, sound is heard with ears, pleasure is detected in the brain, so you use charts and test gear, makes sense doesn't it
Are you aware of what I do for a living?
Chris