Sick pioneer SA6200

For the three and more legged things
User avatar
Mike H
Amstrad Tower of Power
Posts: 20189
Joined: Sat Oct 04, 2008 5:38 pm
Location: The Fens
Contact:

#91

Post by Mike H »

So there you are. Where are you? :D



 
 
"No matter how fast light travels it finds that the darkness has always got there first, and is waiting for it."
User avatar
Ali Tait
Eternally single
Posts: 4387
Joined: Fri Jun 08, 2007 8:10 pm
Location: Galashiels

#92

Post by Ali Tait »

If you have a dac it's worth using the digi out from the Sky box. Quite a bit better than the analogue outs imho.
User avatar
colin.hepburn
Shed dweller
Posts: 2294
Joined: Sat Jun 02, 2007 1:24 am
Location: Scotland Aberdeenshire

#93 Re: A Second Pioneer SA-6200

Post by colin.hepburn »

colin.hepburn wrote:Well I Have Just Acquired a second Pioneer SA-6200 well in January I will so thinking I will bi-amp the system using the NAD pre-Amp as I am at the moment with the SA-2600 or maybe a Nelson Pass BI Buffer

So which way to bi- Amp the normal way one amp driving Left/Right bass with the other amp driving the Left/Right top end Or Use The Mono Button And mono Block The Amps placing by the Speaker With sort speaker leads and longer interconnections which way would you think best
Well Got the Second Pioneer SA-6200 today after seven day on the road dont ask :)
OK Here's the verdict on it
1} Preamp volume control and selector and Switches Nakard
2} Noisy intermittent Transistor in Left Preamp Channel
3} Bad Capacitors and or Transistor Dry Joints in phono Stage
resulting in a Cracking Sound? That follows the bass notes
However this is not a problem As the Pre-Amp is the weakest link in the amp anyway and will be pulled out
As I only want to use the power Amp which Works Fine But will be Re Capping And silver wired and then Re Cased
This will be done to both the amps and they will be bi-amped in to the system
However as we are unsure what the idle Current should be set at for both these amp I checked this amp to find it was much higher than I expect
61mV/0.5R=122mA :shock: Heatsink is warm but i still can leave my hand on it
Colin
The Blues man ImageImage
User avatar
Mike H
Amstrad Tower of Power
Posts: 20189
Joined: Sat Oct 04, 2008 5:38 pm
Location: The Fens
Contact:

#94

Post by Mike H »

Are you sure you're not reading millivolts as milliamps again?

If it's actually 61mV then it's only 30.5mA.



 
 
"No matter how fast light travels it finds that the darkness has always got there first, and is waiting for it."
User avatar
Nick
Site Admin
Posts: 15748
Joined: Sun May 06, 2007 10:20 am
Location: West Yorkshire

#95

Post by Nick »

Mike H wrote:Are you sure you're not reading millivolts as milliamps again?

If it's actually 61mV then it's only 30.5mA.



Are you sure about that

61/0.5 = 61*2 = 122
Whenever an honest man discovers that he's mistaken, he will either cease to be mistaken or he will cease to be honest.
User avatar
colin.hepburn
Shed dweller
Posts: 2294
Joined: Sat Jun 02, 2007 1:24 am
Location: Scotland Aberdeenshire

#96

Post by colin.hepburn »

Nick wrote:
Mike H wrote:Are you sure you're not reading millivolts as milliamps again?

If it's actually 61mV then it's only 30.5mA.



Are you sure about that

61/0.5 = 61*2 = 122
Yep thats what I am thinking as well nick
Mikes : 61mV*0.5R=30.5mA :) :?
Mine: 61mV/0.5R=122mA
Colin
The Blues man ImageImage
User avatar
Mike H
Amstrad Tower of Power
Posts: 20189
Joined: Sat Oct 04, 2008 5:38 pm
Location: The Fens
Contact:

#97

Post by Mike H »

OK so I pressed the wrong key. Image


It's too much then.


Possibly.


 
 
"No matter how fast light travels it finds that the darkness has always got there first, and is waiting for it."
User avatar
colin.hepburn
Shed dweller
Posts: 2294
Joined: Sat Jun 02, 2007 1:24 am
Location: Scotland Aberdeenshire

#98

Post by colin.hepburn »

Mike H wrote:OK so I pressed the wrong key. Image


It's too much then.


Possibly.


No Worries mike pressed the wrong button AH :shock: :D :D
122 mA to much then I was hoping I would be able to get the correct current reading of this amp hopping that no one had be inside it But as someone has changed the mains lead inside so can't say if they have tampered with the current or not
This amp has been running continually @ this 122mA for the last three day mostly the AV system its warm but you can keep your hand on the headshink ok and it seems stably and sound is good to
Colin
The Blues man ImageImage
User avatar
Mike H
Amstrad Tower of Power
Posts: 20189
Joined: Sat Oct 04, 2008 5:38 pm
Location: The Fens
Contact:

#99

Post by Mike H »

So at least that proves it's possible. Which is useful to know.

Could be just because the presets have gone "dirty" :?:

Were you going to replace them on the other one? Or did you?




 
 
"No matter how fast light travels it finds that the darkness has always got there first, and is waiting for it."
User avatar
colin.hepburn
Shed dweller
Posts: 2294
Joined: Sat Jun 02, 2007 1:24 am
Location: Scotland Aberdeenshire

#100

Post by colin.hepburn »

Mike H wrote:So at least that proves it's possible. Which is useful to know.

Could be just because the presets have gone "dirty" :?:

Were you going to replace them on the other one? Or did you?




No not yet But it is the plan to replace the Pre-sets when I recap at the same time But I Did Clean and turned the back and frothy a few time on the other amp and reset to run about 80mA and had no problems with it and it runs only just warm to the touch
Colin
The Blues man ImageImage
User avatar
Mike H
Amstrad Tower of Power
Posts: 20189
Joined: Sat Oct 04, 2008 5:38 pm
Location: The Fens
Contact:

#101

Post by Mike H »

OK then!



 
 
"No matter how fast light travels it finds that the darkness has always got there first, and is waiting for it."
User avatar
colin.hepburn
Shed dweller
Posts: 2294
Joined: Sat Jun 02, 2007 1:24 am
Location: Scotland Aberdeenshire

#102

Post by colin.hepburn »

Mike H wrote:OK then!



OK so running each amp @ 80mA should be OK then
40mV/0.5R=80mA
I always thought you added up the total Current of all the amp parts i.e. preamp phono power amp to set the idle up
I find this idle current thing a tad confusing Example My NAD 352 taking from the manual
300 ohms for 5-6.5mV reading on meter
.6.5mV/300R=21mA seems very low for an 80 WATT Amp when you consider the pioneer is only a 22 watter
Last edited by colin.hepburn on Sat Dec 11, 2010 12:39 am, edited 1 time in total.
Colin
The Blues man ImageImage
User avatar
Nick
Site Admin
Posts: 15748
Joined: Sun May 06, 2007 10:20 am
Location: West Yorkshire

#103

Post by Nick »

It depends on how much class A its designed for, higher idle current = more class A.
Whenever an honest man discovers that he's mistaken, he will either cease to be mistaken or he will cease to be honest.
User avatar
colin.hepburn
Shed dweller
Posts: 2294
Joined: Sat Jun 02, 2007 1:24 am
Location: Scotland Aberdeenshire

#104

Post by colin.hepburn »

Nick wrote:It depends on how much class A its designed for, higher idle current = more class A.
Yep that's what I figured the higher idle Current is the longer the amp stays in Class A But in the Case of the pioneers here the idle current is not stated in the schematic so what sets the limit you can increase the current too also see this link http://www.tnt-audio.com/clinica/bias_e.html
Colin
The Blues man ImageImage
User avatar
Mike H
Amstrad Tower of Power
Posts: 20189
Joined: Sat Oct 04, 2008 5:38 pm
Location: The Fens
Contact:

#105

Post by Mike H »

Yep that's why I always try to use sealed enclosed presets, including multi-turn where most appropriate.

I guess the DC bias could be as much as it will stand heat wise.

About 25 years ago I'd got meself a new Pioneer 100W per channel amp, had a big heatsink in it that was always hot even at low power / idle. From which I deduced the bias was on the high side on purpose for more class A.



 
 
"No matter how fast light travels it finds that the darkness has always got there first, and is waiting for it."
Post Reply