KT120 Tryout as SE

What people are working on at the moment
User avatar
Paul Barker
Social Sevices have been notified
Posts: 8985
Joined: Mon May 21, 2007 9:42 pm

#121

Post by Paul Barker »

cressy wrote:the 66 was a bit bass light compared to the 88 and 120 but had better treble extension and sounded overall abit sweeter.
Base light because it is twice the impedance your transformers don't suit it that's all.

If you had each valve type in it's correctly designed transformers: no base light.

Same transformers, higher impedance valve always will sound bass light compared to a valve of half the impedance.
"Two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I am not yet completely sure about the universe." – Albert Einstein
User avatar
colin.hepburn
Shed dweller
Posts: 2294
Joined: Sat Jun 02, 2007 1:24 am
Location: Scotland Aberdeenshire

#122

Post by colin.hepburn »

Out of interest the feedback in the cathode of the Kt120 is confusing me a bit as Steve is just using the cap I thought the resistor also had to be lifted from ground as well as the cap
As in mike Hs version is this a better way to do it and can i do it this way on my JE labs EL34SE amp
Colin
The Blues man ImageImage
User avatar
Cressy Snr
Amstrad Tower of Power
Posts: 10579
Joined: Wed May 30, 2007 12:25 am
Location: South Yorks.

#123

Post by Cressy Snr »

colin.hepburn wrote:Out of interest the feedback in the cathode of the Kt120 is confusing me a bit as Steve is just using the cap I thought the resistor also had to be lifted from ground as well as the cap
As in mike Hs version is this a better way to do it and can i do it this way on my JE labs EL34SE amp
If you use the resistor and the cap together, you are passing the output valve bias current through the OPT secondary. This DC offset may or may not be a problem. I prefer it not to be there. Just using the cap in the feedback loop avoids DC on the OPT secondary.

No reason why you can't use cathode feedback on the EL34 amp, but you need to be aware that when using this kind of feedback scheme, it is very easy to end up with positive rather than negative feedback. Unlike global feedback where the amp wll start howling if the feedback is the wrong way round, with this cathode feedback scheme (IME) you don't get oscillation.
What you do get is an increase in loudness for the same volume setting you had before feedback. This tells you the feedback is wrong polarity. You need to reverse transformer primary if that happens, so that you get a decrease in volume.
Sgt. Baker started talkin’ with a Bullhorn in his hand.
User avatar
Mike H
Amstrad Tower of Power
Posts: 20189
Joined: Sat Oct 04, 2008 5:38 pm
Location: The Fens
Contact:

#124

Post by Mike H »

colin.hepburn wrote:As in mike Hs version is this a better way to do it and can i do it this way on my JE labs EL34SE amp
Are you sure it's 'my' version and I didn't just copy it from somewhere else? I'm not :lol:
 
"No matter how fast light travels it finds that the darkness has always got there first, and is waiting for it."
User avatar
colin.hepburn
Shed dweller
Posts: 2294
Joined: Sat Jun 02, 2007 1:24 am
Location: Scotland Aberdeenshire

#125

Post by colin.hepburn »

[quote="SteveTheShadow
If you use the resistor and the cap together, you are passing the output valve bias current through the OPT secondary. This DC offset may or may not be a problem. I prefer it not to be there. Just using the cap in the feedback loop avoids DC on the OPT secondary.

[/quote]
Thanks Steve for the lowdown on this method of feedback I don't use any feedback in the JE amp but may try this thou
Colin
The Blues man ImageImage
User avatar
colin.hepburn
Shed dweller
Posts: 2294
Joined: Sat Jun 02, 2007 1:24 am
Location: Scotland Aberdeenshire

#126

Post by colin.hepburn »

Mike H wrote:
colin.hepburn wrote:As in mike Hs version is this a better way to do it and can i do it this way on my JE labs EL34SE amp
Are you sure it's 'my' version and I didn't just copy it from somewhere else? I'm not :lol:
i took it to be your idea as it came from your website I think :lol:
Colin
The Blues man ImageImage
User avatar
Cressy Snr
Amstrad Tower of Power
Posts: 10579
Joined: Wed May 30, 2007 12:25 am
Location: South Yorks.

#127

Post by Cressy Snr »

More experimentation today has resulted in the EF184 being triode strapped.
The reason was that though pentode mode worked well, I felt that triode strapping the KT120
lost some of the detail I had been getting from Ultralinear.
But I couldn't return to ultralinear operation of the output stage and keep the pentode drive as tonally it wasn't right.

I used this loadline put forward in 2006 by Tom Schlangen at ETF of that year.

Image

Fantastic linearity with enough current to drive KT120s in Ultralinear mode.
Sgt. Baker started talkin’ with a Bullhorn in his hand.
User avatar
Cressy Snr
Amstrad Tower of Power
Posts: 10579
Joined: Wed May 30, 2007 12:25 am
Location: South Yorks.

#128

Post by Cressy Snr »

The schematic is shown below with voltages and currents:

Image

Because it was less cumbersome to reverse the OPT primary than the secondary to get the feedback in the correct polarity,
the Ultralinear connection is at 57% of primary turns rather than 43%,
and the schematic of the output transformer shows this, but there is no downside, it sounds lovely.

I'm now at a better point soundwise than I was with the MH4 driver.
Tone and detail are excellent with superb bass response.

I like it very much.
Sgt. Baker started talkin’ with a Bullhorn in his hand.
User avatar
Paul Barker
Social Sevices have been notified
Posts: 8985
Joined: Mon May 21, 2007 9:42 pm

#129

Post by Paul Barker »

That's interesting.
"Two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I am not yet completely sure about the universe." – Albert Einstein
User avatar
ed
retired
Posts: 5384
Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2007 4:01 pm
Location: yorkshire
Contact:

#130

Post by ed »

yeah.....very interesting...gonna have a go at this 6ej7 into sv811
There's nowhere you can be that isn't where you're meant to be
JamesD
Old Hand
Posts: 997
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 4:26 pm
Location: North Yorkshire

#131

Post by JamesD »

Hee Hee Hee....

EF184 strikes again...

Damn! Hush my mouth!

But I am surprised it can take on an MH4 for tone...

not surprised the bass is better or the detail but I would have backed the MH4 for tone..

Fascinating stuff - Thanks Steve!

J
User avatar
Cressy Snr
Amstrad Tower of Power
Posts: 10579
Joined: Wed May 30, 2007 12:25 am
Location: South Yorks.

#132

Post by Cressy Snr »

Hi James,

I don't think it would beat the earlier versions of the MH4 such as AC/HL or the globe MH4 with the bigger anode structure. Steve let me hear an AC/HL and a few other early globe shaped equivalents to the MH4 when I took the amp to his place when it was only a little 3/4 watter.

The tone these valves of Steve's produced was to die for :cry:

OTOH I do think the EF184 beats the later version produced after the war, which is the one I have, not by much, but it does. It is also by far, the quietest input valve I have ever used. The silence is total when the amp is idling resulting in very good instrumental separation and the absence of distortion produced by following Tom Schlangen's loadline and op point is very audible, if you know what I mean.

There is also another point to be made in that it seems to me that the KT120 was quite deliberately designed from the outset, to perform at its best when operated in ultralinear mode. There is simply no contest, at least when compared to triode operation there isn't.

The sound it produces when UL configured is in a different league to triode operation. Of course that's only my experience with this power pentode, others might think differently.
Sgt. Baker started talkin’ with a Bullhorn in his hand.
User avatar
ed
retired
Posts: 5384
Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2007 4:01 pm
Location: yorkshire
Contact:

#133

Post by ed »

gonna have a go....I only have the 12hg7 to compare with, which I tried when I first played with the sv valves...Pete Millet had said really good things about the 12hg7/12gn7, but I didn't fall in love with it....

to my ears the ecc83/82 aikido sounded much more sparkly, so I stuck with it....time to have another try.
There's nowhere you can be that isn't where you're meant to be
User avatar
Paul Barker
Social Sevices have been notified
Posts: 8985
Joined: Mon May 21, 2007 9:42 pm

#134

Post by Paul Barker »

It appears to be too good for words.

There is one elephant in the room. Oscillation.

Watch out, build defences.
"Two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I am not yet completely sure about the universe." – Albert Einstein
User avatar
Cressy Snr
Amstrad Tower of Power
Posts: 10579
Joined: Wed May 30, 2007 12:25 am
Location: South Yorks.

#135

Post by Cressy Snr »

Paul Barker wrote:It appears to be too good for words.

There is one elephant in the room. Oscillation.

Watch out, build defences.
Oh yes!
With my EF184 input stage, I have 100ohm carbon composition screen stoppers right up against the g2 pin. There are also 1K carbon composition control grid stoppers up against the g1 pin.

So far so good.
Sgt. Baker started talkin’ with a Bullhorn in his hand.
Post Reply