Inexpensive balanced push-pull amp with DHT driver.
- Cressy Snr
- Amstrad Tower of Power
- Posts: 10582
- Joined: Wed May 30, 2007 12:25 am
- Location: South Yorks.
#1 Inexpensive balanced push-pull amp with DHT driver.
This little amplifier came into my head this morning and I am getting quite
excited about the possibilities.
The 6AQ5, 7 pin miniature output tetrode is a 6V6 in a little bottle.
Cheap as chips NOS at a fiver apiece and easy to come by. I've ordered eight.
This amp will use four per channel in a parallel tetrode push-pull, anode-follower output configuration, with gas tube regulated screens.
Drivers will be Mullard DCC90 miniature, directly heated, double triodes, lit with AC from a Hammond 2.5V heater transformer per channel. This little double DHT is ideal for a differential driver stage as it has a centre-tapped cathode.
It produced a magic sound as part of an all DHT phono stage a few years ago but was too microphonic in that application. As a DHT diff driver stage, it should be much less troublesome in that department.
3.5mA would probably not be sufficient drive current for a parallel push pull triode output stage, but should be fine driving a tetrode configured output.
Should get 20W per channel, in class AB1, no trouble.
I'll post a schematic proposal for comment later on.
excited about the possibilities.
The 6AQ5, 7 pin miniature output tetrode is a 6V6 in a little bottle.
Cheap as chips NOS at a fiver apiece and easy to come by. I've ordered eight.
This amp will use four per channel in a parallel tetrode push-pull, anode-follower output configuration, with gas tube regulated screens.
Drivers will be Mullard DCC90 miniature, directly heated, double triodes, lit with AC from a Hammond 2.5V heater transformer per channel. This little double DHT is ideal for a differential driver stage as it has a centre-tapped cathode.
It produced a magic sound as part of an all DHT phono stage a few years ago but was too microphonic in that application. As a DHT diff driver stage, it should be much less troublesome in that department.
3.5mA would probably not be sufficient drive current for a parallel push pull triode output stage, but should be fine driving a tetrode configured output.
Should get 20W per channel, in class AB1, no trouble.
I'll post a schematic proposal for comment later on.
Last edited by Cressy Snr on Sun May 26, 2013 6:16 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Sgt. Baker started talkin’ with a Bullhorn in his hand.
- Paul Barker
- Social Sevices have been notified
- Posts: 8988
- Joined: Mon May 21, 2007 9:42 pm
#2
You are using the DCC90 balanced are you?
"Two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I am not yet completely sure about the universe." – Albert Einstein
- Cressy Snr
- Amstrad Tower of Power
- Posts: 10582
- Joined: Wed May 30, 2007 12:25 am
- Location: South Yorks.
#3
Yes.Paul Barker wrote:You are using the DCC90 balanced are you?
Sgt. Baker started talkin’ with a Bullhorn in his hand.
- Paul Barker
- Social Sevices have been notified
- Posts: 8988
- Joined: Mon May 21, 2007 9:42 pm
#4
Will be nice to hear them.
"Two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I am not yet completely sure about the universe." – Albert Einstein
- Cressy Snr
- Amstrad Tower of Power
- Posts: 10582
- Joined: Wed May 30, 2007 12:25 am
- Location: South Yorks.
#5
Bollocks!
Forgot to take the Fb into account.
the DCC90 has a gain of 16, so with Fb applied I'm stuffed.
I'll have to have another think, or risk triode operation and hope it doesn't slew limit.
Could parallell up the front end if necessary, to increase drive current as the balanced drive from
the DAC has more than enough welly to cope with the input capacitance.
I have loads of DCC90s and 3A5s picked up NOS for a song some years ago.
Jeez! I'll have another think.
Forgot to take the Fb into account.
the DCC90 has a gain of 16, so with Fb applied I'm stuffed.
I'll have to have another think, or risk triode operation and hope it doesn't slew limit.
Could parallell up the front end if necessary, to increase drive current as the balanced drive from
the DAC has more than enough welly to cope with the input capacitance.
I have loads of DCC90s and 3A5s picked up NOS for a song some years ago.
Jeez! I'll have another think.
Sgt. Baker started talkin’ with a Bullhorn in his hand.
- Paul Barker
- Social Sevices have been notified
- Posts: 8988
- Joined: Mon May 21, 2007 9:42 pm
#6
Can't you then do two stages of DCC90?
Use stage one without feedback for initial voltage amplification and use shunt feedback between the output tube and the intermediate balanced drivers. Short feedback not including the OPT to reduce output impedance primarily.
R22 in the above schematic. He talks on it in the link to teach you how to calculate Fr, but you could just use a pot and adjust to taste.
Use stage one without feedback for initial voltage amplification and use shunt feedback between the output tube and the intermediate balanced drivers. Short feedback not including the OPT to reduce output impedance primarily.
R22 in the above schematic. He talks on it in the link to teach you how to calculate Fr, but you could just use a pot and adjust to taste.
Last edited by Paul Barker on Sat May 25, 2013 5:04 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"Two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I am not yet completely sure about the universe." – Albert Einstein
- Cressy Snr
- Amstrad Tower of Power
- Posts: 10582
- Joined: Wed May 30, 2007 12:25 am
- Location: South Yorks.
#7
Aye, could do that. Cheers Paul.Paul Barker wrote:Can't you then do two stages of DCC90?
Use stage one without feedback for initial voltage amplification and use shunt feedback between the output tube and the intermediate balanced drivers. Short feedback not including the OPT to reduce output impedance primarily.
Sgt. Baker started talkin’ with a Bullhorn in his hand.
#8
I'll be interested to see what power output you get from them - I did a design for a pair of 6005 in PP that got to 15Watts for the pair but needed to go heavily into A2 to do it - the 6AQ5 likes to go into A2 to the extent of about +20V in triode mode. It needs a good driver and either dc or IT connection to do it but really responds well.
J.
J.
- Cressy Snr
- Amstrad Tower of Power
- Posts: 10582
- Joined: Wed May 30, 2007 12:25 am
- Location: South Yorks.
#9
Aye.. the limited power is why I chose to parallel them up as an output stage.
that, and the fact that by doing it I can also use Nick's push-pull 300B output transformers, he has at one of his external storage facilities, ie my house
According to the scuttlebutt you can get 10Wpc class AB1 out of a pair so maybe 20W out of four of the little blighters per channel.
that, and the fact that by doing it I can also use Nick's push-pull 300B output transformers, he has at one of his external storage facilities, ie my house
According to the scuttlebutt you can get 10Wpc class AB1 out of a pair so maybe 20W out of four of the little blighters per channel.
Sgt. Baker started talkin’ with a Bullhorn in his hand.
#11
ACF would work very nicely
I used an Aikido CF to save on valves! Its very easy to spend ten times as much on the drivers as on the outputs with 6AQ5!
I like Steve's idea of using inexpensive DHTs to drive them too. DCC90s are a neat idea
J
I used an Aikido CF to save on valves! Its very easy to spend ten times as much on the drivers as on the outputs with 6AQ5!
I like Steve's idea of using inexpensive DHTs to drive them too. DCC90s are a neat idea
J
- Cressy Snr
- Amstrad Tower of Power
- Posts: 10582
- Joined: Wed May 30, 2007 12:25 am
- Location: South Yorks.
#12
OK here's the concept diagram.
1st and second stages are DC coupled, short plate to grid feedback loop around output stage, conventional screen supply at the moment.
1st and second stages are DC coupled, short plate to grid feedback loop around output stage, conventional screen supply at the moment.
Sgt. Baker started talkin’ with a Bullhorn in his hand.
#13
Just a note on the 'plate to plate' feedback. It will work, as you know, like it is but for the best results the driver should have a constant output impedance and either a very high impedance or a very low impedance.
So a pentode is a very good driver if you are using this feedback connection. A DHP would be fun - DHT into DHP into 6AQ5 for instance. If not a DHP then one of the twin pentodes would be nice too. Of course with the pentode driver the first stage is probably not needed...
Just a thought or two:)
ciao
James
So a pentode is a very good driver if you are using this feedback connection. A DHP would be fun - DHT into DHP into 6AQ5 for instance. If not a DHP then one of the twin pentodes would be nice too. Of course with the pentode driver the first stage is probably not needed...
Just a thought or two:)
ciao
James
- Cressy Snr
- Amstrad Tower of Power
- Posts: 10582
- Joined: Wed May 30, 2007 12:25 am
- Location: South Yorks.
#14
Aye.... you need hi gm drivers and all that for this sort of feedback scheme. As you say, it'll work, but something working is a lot different to is sounding any good.JamesD wrote:Just a note on the 'plate to plate' feedback. It will work, as you know, like it is but for the best results the driver should have a constant output impedance and either a very high impedance or a very low impedance.
So a pentode is a very good driver if you are using this feedback connection. A DHP would be fun - DHT into DHP into 6AQ5 for instance. If not a DHP then one of the twin pentodes would be nice too. Of course with the pentode driver the first stage is probably not needed...
Just a thought or two:)
ciao
James
Sgt. Baker started talkin’ with a Bullhorn in his hand.
- Paul Barker
- Social Sevices have been notified
- Posts: 8988
- Joined: Mon May 21, 2007 9:42 pm
#15
At least you are getting loads of experinece with your cAd that you draw schematics in.
"Two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I am not yet completely sure about the universe." – Albert Einstein