audio-talk Forum Index audio-talk
The place to discuss anything involving sound
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
 

All DHT Phono Stage
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    audio-talk Forum Index -> Everyones Projects
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Nick
Site Admin


Joined: 06 May 2007
Posts: 5676
Location: West Yorkshire

PostPosted: Tue Feb 23, 2010 8:06 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Just for fun, why not current reg the filaments and include the cathode resistor to give the required bias?
_________________
You try to create an idiot proof system, mother nature just creates a 'better' idiot.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Andrew
Shed dweller


Joined: 24 May 2007
Posts: 2301

PostPosted: Tue Feb 23, 2010 8:59 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

SteveTheShadow wrote:
OK a bit further on now

Here is a proposed HT regulated supply for one of the pairs of DCC90s;
this courtesy of a National Semiconductor application paper (I'm not clever enough to do my own,
or that inclined to reinvent the wheel Smile)


Steve


Ah the Maida reg, Nat Semi Data Sheet 47.

Steve, please take a look at the power supplies for the LCR and Colin's C3g phono.

I have been here, know what bits get hot, and even have a vero board layout.

As you say, no point re-inventing the wheel, the info should all be in those threads.

-- Andrew
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Andrew
Shed dweller


Joined: 24 May 2007
Posts: 2301

PostPosted: Tue Feb 23, 2010 9:01 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Mike H wrote:
Sorry only just seen this!


Andrew wrote:
Hang, maybe I'm missing something here, but how does the valve know what's behind the regulator?

I believe it doesn't Question ~ hopefully the desired result is that the regulated output (+ & –) looks like just another battery


So, why do you need separate TX's? Wouldn't separate regs do it, which is what I think Nick is alluding to.

-- Andrew
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Nick
Site Admin


Joined: 06 May 2007
Posts: 5676
Location: West Yorkshire

PostPosted: Tue Feb 23, 2010 9:39 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yes, doing it that way you could have a common ground.
_________________
You try to create an idiot proof system, mother nature just creates a 'better' idiot.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
simon
Needs to get out more


Joined: 24 May 2007
Posts: 1518
Location: People's Republic of South Yorkshire

PostPosted: Tue Feb 23, 2010 1:02 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Nick wrote:
Just for fun, why not current reg the filaments and include the cathode resistor to give the required bias?

Can't quite imagine how that would look? The filaments in this phono aren't straightforward, at least to me anyway. Or am I imaginging it more complicated than you mean?

Interesting project Steve - very interested to see how lots of regulation compares to big passives and batteries. As another alternative, my phono using John Broskie's pcbs has a ICXY CCS protecting a LD1085 - really quite straightforward to implement and seems to work well enough. It's probably not appropriate for me to post the circuit here, though it'll be buried on Tubecad somewhere, but I could send you a scan if you're interested?

I think Will tried choke loading the anodes to maximise the gain, but I think he struggled with it a bit. Might be worth considering to avoid the extra stage? And if you're going to add another stage why not another DCC90? There's a challenge for you Smile.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Nick
Site Admin


Joined: 06 May 2007
Posts: 5676
Location: West Yorkshire

PostPosted: Tue Feb 23, 2010 1:28 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Well, you could either put both heater supplies in series, input valve connected to ground, second valve to current regulator. Parallel the heaters in each valve to require 220ma @1.4v, then feed them both from a 220ma current source.

or keep them separate and use a 220ma current source for each valve. To get the bias for the second stage add a 5R9 resistor between the heater and ground to create the 1.3v bias.

If needed I will draw it out tonight.

_________________
You try to create an idiot proof system, mother nature just creates a 'better' idiot.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Mike H
No idea why I do this anymore


Joined: 04 Oct 2008
Posts: 6596
Location: East Anglia, or Darn Sarf and then left a bit

PostPosted: Tue Feb 23, 2010 1:30 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Nick wrote:
Yes, doing it that way you could have a common ground.

OK gotcha, cos it's 3V with a 1.5V 'tap' so to speak. Not sure how to do it though.

.

_________________
I'm not really here this is a life-sized cardboard cut-out
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Mike H
No idea why I do this anymore


Joined: 04 Oct 2008
Posts: 6596
Location: East Anglia, or Darn Sarf and then left a bit

PostPosted: Tue Feb 23, 2010 1:32 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

No I do. I think ....
_________________
I'm not really here this is a life-sized cardboard cut-out
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Nick
Site Admin


Joined: 06 May 2007
Posts: 5676
Location: West Yorkshire

PostPosted: Tue Feb 23, 2010 2:01 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I will try and draw it out tonight. I could always be wrong.
_________________
You try to create an idiot proof system, mother nature just creates a 'better' idiot.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
simon
Needs to get out more


Joined: 24 May 2007
Posts: 1518
Location: People's Republic of South Yorkshire

PostPosted: Wed Feb 24, 2010 1:01 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Right, I think I understand, though I really must get my head around sinks and sources one day - the current source bit lost me.

I have the valves to have a go at this one day. I think I'd be inclined to have separate current regs for each valve, unless I can find some big batteries that will give 1.4V - listening to Steve's I got the impression, and I might be wrong, that the filaments didn't like being starved.

And three separate regs for the HT. With anode chokes.

But all that regulation might kill what I really like about this phono so who knows...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Mike H
No idea why I do this anymore


Joined: 04 Oct 2008
Posts: 6596
Location: East Anglia, or Darn Sarf and then left a bit

PostPosted: Wed Feb 24, 2010 1:58 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I thought I had the heater regs arrangements sorted out for a minute, but no.

Why can't one 3V reg supply both valve heaters in series?

.

_________________
I'm not really here this is a life-sized cardboard cut-out
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    audio-talk Forum Index -> Everyones Projects All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
Page 9 of 9

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You can attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group

Protected by Anti-Spam ACP